When I lived in San Francisco I was privileged to meet several members of what was then known as the Holy Order of MANS (in which MANS stands for “Mysterion, Agape, Nous, Sophia,” Greek for mystery, love, mind, and wisdom). I became interested in their organization, both because of the tremendous sincerity and integrity of the members I met and because of their study of tarot as a Christian mystery. They adopted the Waite-Smith Tarot as modified by Paul Foster Case and Jessie Burns Parke, added their own layer of modifications to the deck, and then wrote a set of explanatory books that are thoughtful revisionings of Case’s text.
The Holy Order of MANS was founded in 1968 by visionary Earl Wilbur Blighton (formerly an electrical engineer) as a monastic order of esoteric, Rosicrucian Christianity dedicated to charity (Raphael Shelters) and their missionary work in 49 states. The order grew rapidly during San Francisco’s hippie era, when members served selflessly to help those in need. My sense is that they followed as closely as they could the model of the earliest Christian churches. Additionally, women could be ordained as priests. As Blighton expressed it in their statement of purpose:
“I care not what doctrine you have or have decided on. But while the world argues over the theological discussions of doctrine, sin, apostolic succession and others, we will remove from the people their problems and give unto them the ray of hope and reality which our Lord Jesus commissioned us to carry forth as Christians and disciples of the Word and the works and the Light and the love of God.”
With Blighton’s death in 1974 there was a prolonged power struggle among Blighton’s wife and others for leadership over the 3,000 members. The new director focused on a more conservative, repressive and less metaphysical path, eventually joining with a defrocked priest from the Russian Orthodox Church. Since 1988 it has splintered into many groups including the Science of Man in Oregon, which was led by Blighton’s wife, Ruth, until her death in 2005.
But their own deck and books were not the extent of the tarot connection. In 1975, at a judo tournament, science fiction author,
Piers Anthony, met and became friends with a brother from the original Order. Anthony was intrigued by their unique mix of Gnostic Christianity, co-ed communalism, and Tarot. Out of this came a character who would appear in several novels: Brother Paul of the Holy Order of Vision. Anthony also created an imaginary deck called the Animation Tarot, having a hundred cards in five suits. By September of 1977 he had a 250,000 word manuscript that no one wanted to publish. Members of the real order were told not to read the manuscript or speak with him, which he regretted, since the novel stemmed in significant part from his admiration of their operation. Anthony reluctantly agreed to splitting the book into a trilogy: God of Tarot, Vision of Tarot and Faith of Tarot. Jove then stopped publishing science fiction and the next two volumes were published by Berkeley (1980). It wasn’t until 1987 that the novel appeared in one volume (NY: Ace). It’s an interesting novel, although I remember it seeming rather incoherent in places—perhaps because I read it as each volume of the trilogy came out.
Although the Holy Order of MANS deck and books owe much to Case’s BOTA materials, there are plenty of additional insights to make them well worth obtaining, especially for those who are interested in a metaphysical Christian approach to the tarot symbols. The revised books, Keystone of the Tarot and the more detailed, Jewels of the Wise, and their color-it-yourself Major Arcana deck are still available here.


Mary K. Greer has made tarot her life work. Check here for reports of goings-on in the tarot world, articles on the history and practice of tarot, and reviews.
11 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 18, 2008 at 11:10 am
Timothy
>”My sense is that they followed as closely as they could the model of the earliest Christian churches in which women could be ordained as priests”
Um, women could not be ordained in the earliests Christian churches. There’s no evidence to support such a doctrinal claim.
God bless…
+Timothy
July 18, 2008 at 11:35 am
marygreer
Timothy – my error. Sorry. I corrected the text.
I found this commentary on the web:
“Even the most militant advocates of female priesthood have not found one magisterial document approving the priesthood. In his Epistle 14: 26, March 11, 494AD. Pope Gelasius addresses a very specific area, Lucania, Bruttium, and Sicilia, which clearly demonstrates the limited nature of this abuse. The Pope sites earlier magisterial declarations against women at the altar.”
http://www.davidmacd.com/catholic/against_catholic_women_priests.htm
Goddess bless…
Mary
July 18, 2008 at 7:26 pm
Beth Roth (Igraine)
Mary, Thank you for this link. I ordered the books and deck as well as the meditations and am truely excited! Also to thank you for all of the wonderful sharing that you do! Today is the Full Moon of Guru Purnima. In India it is a holy day where they give thanks to their personal guru. Gu = darkness and Ru = one who dispels it. So the GURU is the bringer of light. So, I just want to say I honor you and consider you to be one of my most cherished gurus on this Full Moon!
Peace* Beth (Igraine)
July 18, 2008 at 10:55 pm
marygreer
Beth – Would like to know what you think of the books & deck, when you get them. Thanks for the etymology of Guru, which ties this concept so closely with the Hermit card – my soul card. While it’s embarrassing to be called a guru, I do enjoy sharing what little light I can shed on tarot matters. Thank you.
Mary
July 19, 2008 at 12:47 am
Beth Roth (Igraine)
I will let you know
July 19, 2008 at 8:03 am
Paul Nagy
I did have the pleasure of meeting Paul Blighton, through I never studied his tarot system. He was friends of Sufi Sam and Joe Miller.
I recall them meditating in the center of a triangle of lit candles. A number of his disciples drifted over to the the Theosophical Society as the succession wars deepened.
This is no place for disputed information but, depending on how you define early christianity, there is evidence in the earliest strata of Pauline Churches of a prophetical and priestly roles to women.
This is known from women’s names in Acts as well as other early evidence. It is true Women’s status became dimenished as the church grew and their previous status marginalized.
Piers Anthony odd novels, I never have been able to finish them myself, is a definite contribution to tarot lore.
July 19, 2008 at 1:43 pm
Ferol Humphrey
Thank for this wonderful addition to our Tarot knowledge. I meet sincere Christians every day who would be delighted with such information.
Like Paul, I have studied extensively and have also found references making the potential of women in solid roles in early Christianity quite plausible. I think that on this topic one will find much variance of opinion on the historicity of things.
July 20, 2008 at 2:18 am
marygreer
I love a bit of controversy – as it gets me digging across the internet. Here’s something from the Harvard University Gazette:
“François Bovon, the Frothingham Professor of the History of Religion at the Divinity School, has made a major contribution toward clarifying our picture of the early Christian world with his publication of a 4th-century text describing the acts of the apostle Philip. The manuscript describes a community of celibate vegetarians in which both women and men functioned as priests.
Bovon and his colleague Bertrand Bouvier of the University of Geneva discovered the manuscript in a monastery library on Mt. Athos in Greece.”
http://www.hno.harvard.edu/gazette/2000/02.03/apocrypha.html
Of course, no amount of evidence will convince the true sceptics. BTW, Mt. Athos is one of the places where it is said that the Virgin Mary came after the death of Christ. Furthermore:
“The manuscript describes Philip and the apostle Bartholomew traveling from town to town with Philip’s sister, a woman named Mariamne. Bovon believes this woman to be Mary Magdalene.”
May 26, 2009 at 4:07 am
G. markley
Hello,
I had the fortune of meeting the order in the mid 1970’s and found them to be sincere and quite balanced in contrast to the many negative press. i spent a great deal of time with a couple of the order missions in europe,tenn and in san fran. the shift to what became orthox is what caused me to bow out, with all due respect. i fell the original order had nothing to apoloigise for.many years later i had the great fortune of meeting the american temple and rev M. Whitney. He introduced me to a european order called the Servants of Light. Thank you M.M. where ever you are now. And thank you for this site, yes the tarot apllication in the order as well as the tree ok loife where great gifts.
June 7, 2009 at 9:49 am
Penny
I just recently read Piers Anthony’s TAROT, in one volume, and I have to say that I thought it amazing on the whole. Ok, it does reflect the sexual chauvanism of the time in which it was written, but if you can look past that, he created a modern narrative on the trials of facing one’s Shadow. I think he must be a Jungian in disquise.
For me, Anthony made his case for expanding the deck to 30 trumps and five suits to incorporate the element of Spirit. I think he intuited the future of tarot. Personally, I’d already added a 79th card to most of my decks similar to Anthony’s “Ghost” card, before I’d even read his novel. The Happy Squirrel card showing up some decks may be a harbinger of an evolving oracle. I would love to see what Robert Place might do with the proposed additions!
I also enjoyed Anthony’s rambling Author’s Note about the meeting the member from MANS that launched the book and his journey through the history of tarot.
I know I’m a little off topic from women clergy, but I thought you’d like to hear from someone who made it through the book!
June 7, 2009 at 12:47 pm
mkg
G. Markley –
Thanks for letting us know more about the Order. Everyone I ever met that was part of it was intelligent, compassionate and committed to helping others.
Penny –
I agree that Anthony’s book was an interesting read (will have to read it again someday). I don’t agree about his changes to the structure of the tarot deck (I’m somewhat of a fundamentalist that way). A lot of people have played with new possibilities, including Timothy Leary (who proposed 24 major arcana). I don’t mind a 79th card (like the William Blake Tarot “Eternity” card and the Happy Squirrel), as I consider them external to the core 78 (but fun). Your topic is right on point.