Part I: Skeptics, Mentalists and Tarot Readers
For purposes of this article let us assume that there is no paranormal or spiritual aspect to tarot readings. Let’s pretend, for the moment, that all tarot readings have a rational basis in easily explained normal human skills.
Skeptics and mentalists reduce tarot reading to just this level. Mentalists utilize skills to make money in public performances, while skeptics denounce any tarot or psychic readings that don’t acknowledge they are merely mental tricks. They claim “pseudo-psychics” exploit human weaknesses and take advantage of the desire to easily gain benefit from something. Pseudo-psychic readings are seen as “too-good-to-be-true” and as giving false hope just to make money. Skeptics claim that psychic and tarot readings can be explained by techniques gathered under the terms Cold and Hot Readings. We will ignore hot readings (that fraudulently use information obtained ahead of time) as our purpose is to examine readings where nothing prior is known about the client.
Eyes-Open, Eyes-Shut
Skeptics and mentalists separate psychics and readers into two categories:
- those who are deliberately conning people (“eyes-open”)
- those who believe they actually have some powers—when all they’ve really done is learned how to do cold reading without realizing it. (“eyes-closed” or “shut-eye”).
Timothy Campbell, an executive of the Ontario Skeptics Society for Critical Inquiry, feels that 99 percent of psychic readers are “eyes-open.”
Orson Welles commented that the occupational disease of fake psychics is to become a shut-eye—to believe in yourself. It was when he began receiving and speaking information instantaneously—without rationalizing it—that he quit doing his psychic act. (Interview for Tannen’s Magic with Jennifer Ward on his life as a magician).
Psychic and tarot readers who are mentalists are eyes-open practitioners. They either honestly explain that they are performing mental tricks or they lie or avoid the issue as part of a deliberate con. Craig Browning challenges fellow mentalists to be willing to be embraced by the public as the ‘real thing’:
“The refusal of going with this route not only delivers to us an up-hill trek in attempting to establish a career, it likewise reveals a sense of ‘guilt’ within our being that negates our ability to be effective as psychic performers. . . . I know what you’re thinking (I am a mind reader, you know…): “That’s not ethical!” Who out there is really all that ethical? . . . Either you want to make money and build up a career or you don’t.”
Obviously there are ethical mentalists and there are mentalists who are hustlers and con artists. (William Lindsay Gresham’s noir classic Nightmare Alley—film and novel—both do a superb job of portraying a carny mentalist.)
According to skeptics this leaves category 2—shut-eyes—as the only avenue through which honest tarot readers (who are not mentalists) operate. Even if you believe there’s a third option (as most of you probably do), for the moment let’s go with this and see where it takes us.
Skeptics
I need to be forthright in acknowledging that I see professional skeptics as fundamentalist proselytizers for a religion of science that operates within a mechanistic world view. Many of these professional skeptics have been described as pseudoskeptics by Marcello Truzzi, in that they take the negative rather than an agnostic position—denial rather than doubt. Besides the paranormal, this group of skeptics also target criminal profiling, many forms of psychological therapies and personality tests, alternative health practices, cults, cold fusion and, until recently, global warming and the greenhouse effect, among many, many others.
They take as a basic assumption that the recipient of a psychic or tarot reading is the victim of a hoax or deception (even if the deception is unintended). It is the skeptic’s responsibility to reveal the fraud and convince the public that a reading has nothing to do with reality or truth—which it is their mission to both vet and protect.
For example, Michael Shermer of Skeptic magazine and director of the Skeptics Society, said in an interview,
“In general, the exposé of out-and-out fraud is not that interesting, because it’s just somebody lying. What’s more interesting is self-deception; how leaders of cults come to believe that they can actually do what they think they can do. . . . There is a real world out there that we can know and the best way to know it is through science. The reason for that is because there’s at least a method, an attempt to corroborate one’s own subjective perceptions.”
As guardians of a scientifically-defined “truth,” they believe that to trust subjective experience threatens the fundamentals of science and must be eliminated. It’s essentially a fear-based stance.
This perspective is stated even more clearly here:
“The use of unsubstantiated techniques eats away at the scientific foundations of the profession of clinical psychology. . . . Once we abdicate our responsibility to uphold high scientific standards in administering treatments, our scientific credibility and influence are badly damaged. Moreover, by continuing to ignore the imminent dangers posed by questionable mental health techniques, we send an implicit message to our students that we are not deeply committed to anchoring our discipline in scientific evidence or to combating potentially unscientific practices. Our students will most likely follow in our footsteps and continue to turn a blind eye to the widening gap between scientist and practitioner, and between research evidence and clinical work” (Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology by Scott O. Lilienfeld, Steven Jay Lynn, Jeffrey M. Lohr, Carol Tavris).
I appreciate the work skeptics, scientists and even mentalists have done in describing techniques used in these kinds of human interactions and in identifying perpetrators of fraud. We can learn a great deal from skeptical watchdogs. What I object to is the reductionist conclusions they reach. Even skeptic Ray Hyman notes that the approach goes too far: “The gut reaction of the scientific orthodoxy is to discredit the offending claim by any means possible – ad hominem attacks, censorship, innuendo, misrepresentation, etc.” (from Hyman’s The Elusive Quarry, quoted in “The Psychology of the Sceptic”).
Cold Reading and Meaning
There are many definitions of cold reading. At its most non-judgmental, cold reading is a term for many methods of gathering information about a person and their circumstances and then telling that person something about him or herself that seems impossible to know.
However, the term is almost always used pejoratively as in this definition from The Skeptic’s Dictionary:
“Cold reading refers to a set of techniques used by professional manipulators to get a subject to behave in a certain way or to think that the cold reader has some sort of special ability that allows him to ‘mysteriously’ know things about the subject. . . . They bank on their subject’s inclination to find more meaning in a situation than there actually is . . . [and] to feel that the manipulator possesses some special power.”
Skeptics attempt to limit all “meaning” to just what is scientifically verifiable, as we can see from a further warning voiced in the Skeptic’s Dictionary,
“Successful cold readings . . . are always a testament to the ability of human beings to make sense out of the most disparate of data. . . . Cold reading always depends on the sitter being willing and able to connect the dots and make sense out of most of what the reader brings up. . . . This is part of subjective validation or the Barnum Effect.”
The Barnum (or Forer) Effect describes the phenomenon that people will find personal meaning in mere commonplace statements and believe them to be perfectly accurate for them, while in fact they apply to almost everyone. People readily perceive (or are led to perceive) information as metaphors, which that person applies in their own way. However, works such as Lakoff and Johnson’s Metaphors We Live By postulates that this is how human beings ascribe and communicate meaning. We can’t do otherwise. And Victor Frankl proposes, in Man’s Search for Meaning, that finding meaning in our experiences, even in the face of a reality that seems to negate it, is a (if not, the) most significant evolutionary and survival mechanism possessed by human beings.
Mentalists
Mentalists (who are often also skeptics) are entertainers who use their skills to create an illusion—to get people to believe something that isn’t true. When a mentalist uses mental tricks as entertainment, it’s a legitimate profession. In this post, however, I refer specifically to the deliberate use of cold reading and even conjuring techniques to do fake psychic or tarot readings. When it’s used as a scam to take advantage of people, it’s not ethical. Advertisements for training in mentalism with the purpose of becoming a psychic or tarot reader usually emphasize making as much money as possible (including selling their procedures at a high price to other mentalists), rather than helping the client. According to one,
“I have earned a LOT of money using this system and I’m pleased that we can now offer it to our customers. I believe that this system gives a no nonsense approach to reading tarot cards. It cuts out all the garbage, leaving the prospective tarot reader with the information required to go out and do successful readings and earn money. All YOU the tarot reader have to do is make your readings entertaining and the repeat bookings will flow in. In the end it is YOU not the cards who are doing the reading, never forget that.”
Another mentalist, Lynne Kelly, created something called Tauromancy that she describes as,
“A fraudulent system for performing ‘psychic’ readings. . . . The reader is able to make a large number of statements about the client which appear to give information the reader could not know without special powers. Using Tauromancy, I have given hundreds of readings using cold reading techniques. Despite this honesty, there have been a number of sitters who are convinced I could not have known the things I claimed to know without psychic insights. I failed to convince them otherwise. Such is the human need to believe.”
You can learn to read like a mentalist at Magiczilla, where you’ll be told that tarot reading relies on a method known as cold reading. This technique is practiced by clairvoyants, psychics and mentalists to make someone believe you can read their underlying thoughts. All you need is a deck of Tarot cards and to memorize the proclamations below. Regardless what cards turn up, deliver the phrases and try to individualize the remarks as much as you can. You will obtain far more ‘hits’ than ‘misses’. To make the effect more ‘realistic’ do each step purposefully. This will give the impression that you know what you are doing.
What follows are standard Barnum Effect phrases:
- You have some character weaknesses but are in most cases are able to compensate for them.
- You have a need for other people to like and respect you.
- You are overly critical of yourself.
- You have substantial extra capacity that you have not yet turned to your benefit.
- Security is one of your major goals in life.
- Disciplined and self-controlled on the outside, you are worrisome and insecure on the inside.
- You become dissatisfied when hemmed in by restrictions and obstructions.
- At times you have serious doubts as to whether you have made the right decision or done the right thing.
- You desire a particular amount of change and variety
- You pride yourself as an independent thinker and do not accept others’ statements without sufficient proof.
- At times you are extroverted, approachable, and sociable, while at other times you are introverted, cautious, and reserved.
- Some of your ambitions can be rather impractical.
- You have found it unwise to be too frank in revealing yourself to others.
The Client or “Subject” of a Reading
To a skeptic, as long as the subject is told that a reading is a hoax, it’s legitimately okay, albeit pitiable or even disgusting, to see how the subject, nevertheless, ascribes meaning to something that isn’t “real.”
Mentalist Michael Hughes has a more empowering take:
“Mentalism, as theatre, succeeds when the audience is convinced that what they’re seeing and experiencing can’t be a trick. When the spoon bends in their hands. When private thoughts are pulled out of their heads. No flashy gimmicks, no death-defying stunts, just pure demonstrations of what seems to be unexplainable.”
Hughes makes sure, though, that the audience leaves empowered by understanding:
“I close all of my shows with a demonstration of mind over matter accomplished only by audience members. They do all the work. And it’s something they can go home and repeat, with their friends. That is magic. That is phenomenal.”
Mentalists have a lot to teach tarot readers about both the entertainment business and the kinds of effects certain communication techniques have on people. Such knowledge, given the right intent, can make us more ethical and aware of what we are doing. [This is the kind of knowledge that’s referred to by Da’at on the Tree of Life. It’s a kind of knowledge that brings with it great danger and great responsibility.]
Part 2 will explore how supposed cold and warm reading techniques are normal modes of human communication—the ways in which we come to know, interact and empathize with others—that can add value to the tarot reading experience.
Added: Listen to a Podcast interview with me and Leisa Refalo at The Tarot Connection.
27 comments
Comments feed for this article
December 2, 2008 at 7:55 am
Tarotsmith
Great post Mary, I really enjoyed it and am looking forward to part II
December 2, 2008 at 8:15 am
Mark
Dear Mary,
Many stage performers are “skeptical” about “psi” stuff. This is mainly due to the fact that most don’t study both stage magic & psi stuff for any real length of time– I have 13 yrs. in “psi” stuff (mainly tarot, hypnosis & magick) & 39 yrs. in stage magic. I love both! LOL
I want your fans to know that people like me and others out there (albiet a minority) can hold a scientific mind and a magical mind at the same time.
We validate you completely!
Plus keep in mind–myths play a wonderful role in our lives, life would be boring without them. At least to me! LOL
Mark
Aurora, CO
P.S. There is also a scientific term called “pseudo-skepticism” (google it). For not all of our skeptical friends are fair with their skepticism…some are conning themselves. No offense meant to my skeptical friends! LOL
December 2, 2008 at 10:35 am
Connie
Mary, thanks for exploring this interesting topic!
I have been doing some reading about “cold reading” and “reading body language” lately, and I have come to understand that although these techniques are often used by “psychics and con artists”, the skill set involved can also be used to develop greater sensitivity to others, and as openers for deeper dialog about personal meaning (just as we use tarot cards!).
My 2 cents….I think that ethics and intention determines whether cold/warm/hot reading is abuse or just good communication.
Looking forward to part II.
Connie
December 2, 2008 at 12:26 pm
mkg
Mark –
There’s definitely a range of skeptics, frauds and believers among any and all groups – which I hope I’ve pointed out.
Thanks for the referral to the pseudoskepticism material. Wikipedia is a good place to start. These articles noted the same tendencies and flaws I found in the writings of the most well-known professional skeptics.
I was once interviewed for a national news program in Australia. The interviewer was warm and supportive. The actual program featured a skeptic criticizing my material (whereas I was not told that a skeptic would also be interviewed and, thus, not allowed to comment on him). Plus, my one minute of air time focused on the only place during a half hour interview when I had stumbled and hesitated over something.
Connie –
Yours are just the points I plan on making in Part II (among a few others). The facts are pretty obvious to those with any familiarity with varieties of human communication. Ethics and intention along with assumptions (worldview) form the crux of the situation.
December 3, 2008 at 10:28 am
Tero Hynynen
Hi Mary,
Thanks again for a very interesting post. I was looking at that Barnum Effect phrases and thought, “hey, this could be a good base for a tarot spread!” – and not forgetting that is does have the magic(k) 13 points, so surely it has to do with transformation, right 😉
I transformed some of the phrases into questions, while other phrases I used more like a springboard for imagination. I found the spread to be quite ‘in your face’ in its style, some shadow work definitely involved!
As the wise ones say, “Blessed are the ones with question marks.” LOL
-tero
December 3, 2008 at 11:08 am
mkg
Tero –
Now that’s what I call creative thinking! How interesting that those Barnum statements make for a spread for shadow work! I think you’ve identified a really important point – that the typical Barnum Effect plays on people’s fears and insecurities, then builds the person back up. It’s similar to brainwashing, but here enacted in miniature in a tarot reading. When done consciously for yourself, such questions can be insightful and empowering.
December 3, 2008 at 7:29 pm
Ferol Humphrey
True dialogue. I appreciate it. People need not agree to further their knowledge and awareness, so I really love this type of exchange. A dialogue of well-expressed differing postures, which lead to new thinking or a true examination of stable thought~ to me that is the most fun you can have. Thanks, all.
December 4, 2008 at 11:53 am
Quiet
Fascinating article.
Just to touch on one aspect of it, I think that reading for others involves engagement. There can be a theatrical air to successful engagement.
One of the best tarot readers in the business, in my opinion, is as much an entertainer as intuitive reader. He has an attractive and engaging personality which really enhances his readings. Yet, I think he knows himself well and really cares about those for whom he reads.
To engage the querent, people may authentically use a variety of approaches. You see, I think that tarot can be as much about engagement, recognition and time given as anything else!
If the there is some authenticity in the reading given, if the querent’s mind awakens to question, to see another aspect or dimension to her life, then she has recieved something really worthwhile.
December 4, 2008 at 2:05 pm
mkg
Quiet –
I think I address some of these points in Part 2 (now posted). In many places it’s a law that tarot readings can be for entertainment purposes only. Thank you for honoring this important component of what we do.
December 4, 2008 at 5:50 pm
DMP
Thank you Mary for raising this topic. It’s been pushed under rug for far too long.
Great stuff!
December 6, 2008 at 8:11 am
Dorothy Kernaghan-Baez
Yikes! It really shocked me to look at the Magiczilla site you referenced in your article. Everybody knows there are charlatans out there, but I’d never seen a site so blatant.
I’ve been psychic all my life, and have read Tarot for most of my adult life. It’s really creepy to know that there are people who basically make a joke out of other people’s gifts.
I’m about to read Part 2. Thank you for writing this.
Dorothy
December 11, 2008 at 6:22 am
Lee
Hi Mary,
I enjoyed your thoughtful article.
You might be interested in a review I wrote several years ago of one of those expensive cold-reading manuals you mention:
http://www.tarotpassages.com/coldreading.htm
— Lee
December 11, 2008 at 6:32 am
Lee
Oops, apologies, I meant to post this on the Part 2 page.
December 11, 2008 at 2:01 pm
mkg
Lee –
It’s worth having the link to this article in both places. Thank you for letting us know about it.
December 11, 2008 at 2:11 pm
mkg
Dorothy –
I don’t think people are making a joke out of it. The people who deliberately work as fake psychics are very serious about making money at what they do, and some work very hard at perfecting their skills. A few may even feel they provide a worthwhile service, even though accomplished through deception.
For me, it was just time to become more conscious and knowledgeable about an area of which I was vaguely aware, but I kind of scorned as if it were beneath my consideration. Then I realized that perhaps I should learn more about it.
BTW, there are mentalists who are also sincere tarot readers and mentalists who who believe in the paranormal.
December 21, 2008 at 11:40 am
Linda
These people give us all a bad reputation.
December 21, 2008 at 7:18 pm
The Tarot Connection » Blog Archive » Episode 93: Cold Readings with Mary Greer
[…] Part 1 to learn about mentalists, skeptics and cold […]
January 18, 2009 at 1:23 pm
mkg
Sally – I’m sure that a few “mentalists” who started doing the work just to make money discovered that there is far more to reading the cards than they had ever imagined. It’s something I’ve noticed on several magician’s forums – the “old-timers” caution that an attitude of study and respect when it comes to tarot will serve better than quick tricks.
January 18, 2009 at 2:10 pm
Jen K.
I’m a professional Tarot reader and will, if the reading appears to be more negative than my client is prepared for, use mentalist skills to turn what information I do get from the cards into a positive experience for the client. I don’t lie to them, but I don’t believe it’s ethical to just relay things that will cause hurt when you can pull information out of the obvious that will help the client to move past the blocks they have often put in front of themselves. Mentalism isn’t always about trickery. Sometimes we have to use whatever is available to relay the information people really need to hear over what they want to hear.
April 19, 2009 at 5:06 am
Christiane
“Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.” -Albert Einstein
As Tarotists we have to deal with the mediocre minds of the professional skeptics, but we’re all getting stronger.
February 8, 2010 at 9:21 pm
ftcrules2
Hmm Well I was just searching on Google for some Tarot readings of some Tarot reader
and just came across your blog, generally I just only visit blogs and retrieve my required
information but this time the useful information that you posted in this post compelled me
to reply here and appreciate your good work. I just bookmarked your blog
August 22, 2010 at 6:00 pm
vera
Best wishes on your blog. Your blog is a great source of ideas and assistance already – and since I discovered it just over a week ago has been of help to me already.
December 20, 2010 at 7:58 am
Benita@Cold Reading
Cold reading has always shocked many people. And what’s not to be very impressed about? Even if the person cannot really read your brain as he could read words in a book, there’s still something indisputably remarkable about a person who can profile you immediately.
March 3, 2011 at 11:48 am
Interviews about change with Rachel Pollack | The Hermit's Lamp
[…] is you can read about on Mary K. Greer’s great series of posts on the subject starting here. I will be interviewing Mary Greer in an upcoming installment of this […]
October 19, 2016 at 7:50 am
Alasdair Thorne
Although it’s an amazing skill to have, profiling someone immediately, it’s not divination. One reason I never cared for the “open reading” techniques is that it’s sort of “make it up as you go along, and something will stick.”
October 1, 2019 at 2:09 am
Learn Tarot – Intuition – Learn Tarot – The Practical Way
[…] If you’re interested in reading more about the dangers of cold reading in tarot, Mary Greer’s very thorough two-part blog post can be found below:https://marykgreer.com/2008/12/01/cold-reading-and-tarot-part-1/https://marykgreer.com/2008/12/04/cold-reading-and-tarot-part-2/ […]
May 13, 2021 at 11:38 am
Intellectual Honesty
You are absolutely speaking from a place of intellectual ignorance and you need to reevaluate your argument.
Also, that Orson Welles video cannot be pressed into the service you’re trying to press it into.