“Watch out for wormholes: you never know what may come out of them.”
— Stephen Hawking
One of the first things people want to know about Tarot is how it works. Most seasoned practitioners will admit they haven’t a clue but have considered a few possibilities including:
- Carl Jung’s theory of synchronicity (not really a theory but rather a belief in meaningful coincidence)
- Quantum physics (theory of entanglement, etc.)
- Psychological projection (as a kind of Rorschach test)
- Contact with a Spiritual Being, Higher Self, Universal Consciousness or paranormal force
- Magic(k) (an as-yet-unknown scientific principle)
- One’s subconscious directing the placement of the cards
- Self-fulfilling prophecies
- A mentalist’s set of cold-reading tricks conjoined with the Barnum Effect
I was fascinated to see that the physicist, Stephen Hawking, in The Universe in a Nutshell (albeit a rehash of his earlier work) addresses this very concern. In a chapter called “Predicting the Future,” he compares astrology to his understanding of how the universe works. I thought we’d also see what modern science might suggest about Tarot’s ability to predict. [I’ll leave it up to the reader to further explore the scientific concepts in bold italics.]
Hawking begins with the provocative statement,
“The human race has always wanted to control the future, or at least to predict what will happen. That is why astrology is so popular. . . There is no more experimental evidence for some of the theories described this book than there is for astrology, but we believe them [scientific theories] because they are consistent with theories that have survived testing.”
Hawking explains how, in the 19th century, Laplace’s scientific determinism proposed that with enough knowledge we could predict the state of the universe at any time in the past or future. In principle, the future is predictable. But, even the tiniest disturbance can cause a major change somewhere else. While the flapping of a butterfly’s wing could cause rain in New York, the sequence of events is not repeatable. “The next time the butterfly flaps its wings, a host of other factors will be different and will also influence the weather.” While a Tarot card might predict an exact event one time, can we count on a repetition of this prediction at another time to be as accurate?
Determinism is also confounded by the uncertainty principle: we cannot accurately measure both the position and the velocity of a particle at the same time. If we put inaccurate data in, we get inaccurate data out. This conundrum led to quantum mechanics, which examines wave function to determine the probability that a particle will have a position and velocity within a certain range. Generally speaking, when there is a small uncertainty in position there is a large uncertainty in velocity and vice versa. Hawking sums this up:
“We now realize that the wave function is all that can be well defined. We cannot even suppose that the particle has a position and velocity that are known to God but are hidden from us. Such “hidden-variable” theories predict results that are not in agreement with observation. Even God is bound by the uncertainty principle and cannot know the position and velocity. He can only know the wave function.”
Wave function gives us a kind of half-determinism in which we can predict either the position or the velocity within any given measure of time. But, it seems, the special theory of relativity threw out the notion of absolute time. It turns out that time is only one direction in a four-dimensional continuum called spacetime. Different observers traveling through space at different velocities each have their own measure of time (oh, no!) in which there are different intervals between events. There is an equation (Schrödinger’s) that, in the flat spacetime of special relativity, can obtain a deterministic evolution of the wave function, but not in the curved spacetime of the general theory of relativity, where a wormhole can create stagnation points. Hawking: “Watch out for wormholes: you never know what may come out of them.”
What follows are several pages on black holes, quasars and singularities (eek!), all leading to the fact that we cannot know the part of the wave function that is inside a black hole—potentially a very large amount of information! Eventually a black hole will lose mass, down to zero, and disappear completely, carrying its hidden information with it.
Hawking explains:
“In general, . . . people such as astrologers and those who consult them are more interested in predicting the future than in retrodicting the past [love that word, “retrodicting”]. At first glance, it might seem that the loss of part of the wave function down the black hole would not prevent us from predicting the wave function outside the black hole. But it turns out that this loss does interfere with such a prediction.”
Without this hidden knowledge it is impossible to predict the spin or the wave function of the particle (in a virtual particle pair) that escapes the black hole—further reducing our power to predict the future. Is there no hope?
“If one particle falls into the black hole, there is no prediction we can make with certainty about the remaining particle. This means that there isn’t any measurement outside the black hole that can be predicted with certainty: our ability to make definite predictions would be reduced to zero. So maybe astrology is no worse at predicting the future than the laws of science.”
UNLESS . . . a black hole is made up of p-branes that move through ten dimensions (3 dimensions of space and 7 additional, unknown ones) that are regarded as sheets in the flat spacetime of special relativity (see above). In that case, time moves forward smoothly so the information in the waves won’t be lost! (Forgive me if I sound a little lost at this point.)
I hate to tell you that Hawking himself now asks:
“Does part of the wave function get lost down black holes, or does all the information get out again, as the p-brane model suggests? This is one of the outstanding questions in theoretical physics today.”
Even Stephen Hawking isn’t sure if “the world is safe and predictable or not.” So how can the rest of us be confident that our pea-brains can figure it all out? I welcome discussion, polite debate, and scientific updates or clarification in the comments section.
Thought: If the “wave function” is all we can predict, then what does this suggest for Tarot? What is the wave function in a Tarot reading?
18 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 15, 2015 at 11:05 am
Gordon Baker
I call Tarot cards the templates of the karmic endowment, or the Harbingers of the Sacred Wound. In the scenes described on the Tarot cards, just as it is in real life, my momentary judgment has been locked into a permanent form that is captured in a single image like a photograph. I think of each Tarot card as describing one of these indelible memories. But the memory is not of the physical event and circumstances, instead it is a memory of a decision about an experience which has later become my habit or my necessary contingency that can be traced back to the moment and those circumstances that are described in the Tarot card. From the confines of memory a template of preference and the pretext for interpreting all future circumstance has been created. From this point on and forever after the decision and meaning established in the moment of the Tarot will color my purpose of every life experience and the execution of every role I play out for the rest of time. The Tarot cards resonate with a specific pattern or persona and invites me to into that relationship through a portal of symbols in the picture. Because of this, every Tarot reading is actually a reading of all 78 cards. Only the order of reading the cards gets changed from time to time, but every card it eternally true.
March 15, 2015 at 5:17 pm
Robert Cohen
Hi Mary
Some say we pick cards at random, and then while we are not looking, the tarot fairy comes in and changes them so they are the right ones. Of course, you have that one covered in your list. But it doesn’t matter, I don’t know how cell phones work either and I don’t care at this point.
I did pick up in a reading not too long ago that what is important about black holes are the light /waves that coming out of them (to us) – and not the issue of our going thru them. We always have things in reverse – the teachings of Socrates and Crowley.
Of course in Kabbalah we travel thru DAAT to the top of the tree, and we have no idea what that will be like – and black hole theories are probably a metaphor for all of that. I’ts not about knowing, it’s about faith and revelation. And so we go thru the darkness and it is all a great mystery. There would be no dark night of the soul if there were no darkness.
March 15, 2015 at 6:03 pm
Del Strachen
I can’t say understand it. Although it would make sense that Divination as a whole exist in another dimension. In that dimension either movie of time is a photograph. Or you can view or access different highways of time. That other dimension is perhaps outside above, below our own. My feeling is that it easier to go from that dimension to the one in which we reside.
Also we may have an antennae or a connection to that non linear and non spatial dimension.
Recently I asked an astrology chart what is astrology. I think it is useful to ask the Tarot what it is. Or perhaps where it is. However I think a certain amount of caution is needed. There is probably a reason why we don’t know or remember certain events.
If the Kaballah is the true of life. Astrology may be the tree of knowledge. Since light life and truth seem related.
March 15, 2015 at 9:44 pm
Barbara Abshire
I adore Stephen Hawking–but his thinking is flawed. Positivist reductionist science always, always omits the obvious–the complete lack of chaos contained in the blueprint for a tree (or any other thing animate or inanimate) it does not deviate but minimally from its original plan and builds itself accurately and flexibly from a small seed, irregardless of wave and particle theory and of being observed or not observed. The tree grows. Time does not exist and space is collapsible, yet the tree grows.
March 15, 2015 at 10:22 pm
Melanie
The wave function seems to me to be exactly how I read Tarot and/or Astrology: I offer an interpretation of the potential energy expression (a range of likely ‘positions’ or ‘velocities’) and the querent (or ‘particle’) tells me what the truth is- what it’s ACTUAL speed or location is -or maybe they don’t tell me, but it becomes clear that they then recognize it precisely after I have described it generally.
Thank you for this thoughtful inter-disciplinary contribution!
March 16, 2015 at 3:44 am
1weaver
Reblogged this on Neptune and the Oak and commented:
I thoroughly enjoyed this post and I hope you do, too…
while I would articulate the general purpose of astro as not being about ‘predicting the future (i.e. events)’ but rather predicting energy flows for capitalizing upon, I was extremely pleased to read Hawkings quote that, ‘There is no more experimental evidence for some of the theories described this book than there is for astrology, but *we believe them [scientific theories] because they are consistent with theories that have survived testing*.”
Exactly!
March 16, 2015 at 7:08 am
pnagy1231
An enjoyable summary of some of Stephen Hawking’s ideas of conflating microphysics with macro cosmology. It is interesting to note that the first philosophers such as Parmenides was certain that time is what does not exist. That change is the bugaboo of little minds. Since it seems so obvious to us that we are always in a flux of shifting perspectives and changing conditions, I wonder who Parmenides was trying to convince?
My theory of tarot tending to be apposite has to do with the mind-field. Each of us carries around a force field that bins are conscious and unconscious choices within the pattern of our predilections. This force field is a sense of unity that mind and matter meld the way a mirror casts a reflection. The question then may become, not so much as predicting the future which by definition does not yet exist, except by the shadows of the past and present, why do we seek to foresee the future using the complex interrelationships of astrology charts or the random fall of a few of 78 cards? Definitely, astrology is far more complex than tarot because it has so many interdependent factors.
On the other hand, the mix of 78 cards can bring up so many possibilities that even if we begin to see paired or triplicated patterns of occurrence the context to which we apply them can seem to us infinite.
Meaningful coincidences occur all the time. It’s just that we generally are not in a position to notice them. I believe the symbolic way that tarot may be interpreted offers us a way of positioning ourselves to notice them. That meaningful coincidences sometimes seem to predict the future is not insight into the future per se, but recognition that we are willing to pay attention.
March 16, 2015 at 9:51 am
Samantha
I have always read Tarot using the ‘butterfly effect’, and focus on events within the timeframe of one year or less for the most accurate readings. I explain to the querent that there is a certaiin amount of predicatbility based on patterns of behaviour, weather, cycling circumstances or whatever is involved in the question (wave forms, if you will). I also explain that there is a certain amount of chaos that is not predicatable – the butterfly effect, since we never can know when, where and which butterfly is flapping its wings. In a reading, we tap into the present dominant wave form to see how the outcome is most likely to occur; but there is also the chance that it can be alterred by non-controllable circumstances – the butterfly effect. Also, the querent may decide that s/he does not like the outcome and go about changing their behaviour, circumstances, etc to effect a new and better one, thus becoming the butterfly.
March 16, 2015 at 10:37 am
mkg
Thank you all for your comments. These are such wonderful perspectives. While we may think we know how something works in the mechanistic, Newtonian world, It’s important that at the cosmic level, even science doesn’t know the “how” – they just know when results appear in accord with their theories. However, astrophysics opens up a whole world in which information is available in the most unimaginable ways.
March 17, 2015 at 10:58 am
Jenna Matlin
Mary, I broached this subject myself a little while ago (if I may link for discussion?) http://www.queenofwandstarot.net/queen-of-wands-blog/does-tarot-tell-the-future where I talk about causality and Tarot. This morning reading an article in the Audubon that while we understand that birds somehow use the magnetic field for directional sense, we cannot find the actual mechanism that does so on the bird!
Mysteries wrapped in enigmas… and may all scientifically minded folk continue to strive for the bleeding edge of inquiry rather than shut down into an overly simplistic test retest analysis for understanding all things in the world and the branes!
March 17, 2015 at 11:21 am
mkg
Jenna –
What a wonderful post on your blog! Thank you for offering the link here as part of the discussion. I think your point that time is not what we think it is, is at the heart of the issue. I really like the picture of the “boiling pot” as an image of time. It is so alien to our programming of seeing time as a line or even as cycles on a clock. The key is that the reality of time is quite different than what we think it is. A mind-opening book on the subject is:
About Time: Cosmology and Culture at the Twilight of the Big Bang by Adam Frank.
I just had the thought – What if our individual lives were like the bubbles in a boiling pot of water? Our individual consciousness differentiates and ‘arises,’ then bursts and disperses, passing eventually back into the sea of consciousness. I wonder if multi-universes could be doing the same thing? But, this thought of mine is in the realm of imagination rather than that of science and doesn’t tell us “how” it all happens.
March 17, 2015 at 11:33 am
shadeosg
Oh this is one I agonize over (a lot!). Are they just pieces of cardboard and I have been using confirmation bias to convince myself something magical is going on? I will say that the rise of traditional Lenormand reading methods has helped soothe my nerves on this issue of Oracular Ability.
March 18, 2015 at 1:04 am
Gordon Wong (炎)
As I know, the uncertainty principle should only work between conjugate variables, only in microscopic world. And it’s the reason why Schrödinger’s cat stucks everyone. How the wave function failures in our normal world, which is rather controlled by Newton’s law and predictable? Likewise, the unpredictable deterministic world of chaos theory has its boundary. It seems we have two or more incompatible worlds. Maybe it’s like a spectrum, then where a tarot reading is on? People use tarot in different ways and they may dwell on different worlds. Actually, science do not find the “how” directly. Scientists assume a lot of “how” and pick out the best match with observation. Our discussion merely images such “hows”. However, unless anybody could perform a double-blind experiment and prove that divination really works in a “scientific” way, scientists should never care about our question. So it’s our own duty to figure out which one the best matches with our respective experience.
March 18, 2015 at 11:46 am
mkg
Gordon –
All your points are very good. I think the reason people look to quantum theories for Tarot is precisely because Newtonian “hows” don’t seem to work. The reality is that most Tarot readers who have explored the possibilities end up throwing their hands up and admitting, “I don’t know how Tarot works, it just does.”
January 2, 2016 at 10:57 pm
Emelda
Dear Mary, I need you to send me a form to fill… I would appreciate your attention.
January 8, 2016 at 11:32 am
Tara Greene www.taratarot.com
hi Mary just came across your article now today on Stephen Hawkings 74th birthday Jan 8 2016. Your quote “What if our individual lives were like the bubbles in a boiling pot of water? Our individual consciousness differentiates and ‘arises,’ then bursts and disperses, passing eventually back into the sea of consciousness. I wonder if multi-universes could be doing the same thing? But, this thought of mine is in the realm of imagination rather than that of science and doesn’t tell us “how” it all happens.” This is exactly what Buddhists say is the nature of our reality. I really feel that the nature of our multiverses,is more organic, is more of a bubbling than a Big Bang. ultimately all of this, even things science can “prove” are still theories and the human consciousness creates its own reality. I feel the yoniverse is much more Feminine bubbling, circular round therefore all points touch one another. A Tarot reader simply tunes into the various surfaces all of which are interconnected and feels the vibrations of the bubbles bursting as it were. This is not such a scientific explanation, its more of a visual sensual poetic one. Nothing is real anyways. There are no ultimate explanations of anything as yet and there probably never will be. the universe is vastly so complex and there are more than 10 dimensions anyways . Even if you refer to the Tree of Life and Kabbalah there are 10 x 4 worlds. + the unknowable YHVH. perhaps that is the wrong question of How does it work. It does and Tarot readers use synchronicity. All time is happening at the same time. It is infinite, all time is happening at the same time. Blessings
January 8, 2016 at 12:07 pm
mkg
Tara – what a wonderful meditation on so-called “reality.” I love it.
March 14, 2018 at 11:38 pm
LizRose93
Reblogged this on elizabeth rose psychic and tarot and commented:
Excellent read